|
Lately, I guess I tend to focus on nurturing and organizing the PoLitics section of the site, however my real love is HiStory?. I wrote the pages on OregoN, GladstoneOregon, and AlchemY. I am currently involved in copying in the 'A' articles in from the BritannicaPublicDomain text. I couldn't help but notice your sliding Aaron of biblical fame into a BiblE/Aaron, and was wondering if you have any comments on how historical, biblical, and mythical figures should be handled. I wrote a quick AchillEus page, and would feel a lot better about his compatriots if they weren't taking up raw WikiNames? (notably Helen and Paris). But on the other hand, it makes wiki-linking a lot worse, doesn't it? While I'm annoying you, I was wondering if you had any ideas on how subdivisions of histories should be kept. As noted, I'm considering moving the stuff on BronzeAge into things like BronzeAgeOfMiddleEast? or some such, while I correct them. But should it be a top-level thing, or kept under BronzeAge, or kept under MiddleEast?? Thanks, JoshuaGrosse |
|
Lately, I guess I tend to focus on nurturing and organizing the PoLitics section of the site, however my real love is HiStory?. I wrote the pages on OregoN, GladstoneOregon, and AlchemY. I am currently involved in copying in the 'A' articles in from the BritannicaPublicDomain text. |
Lately, I guess I tend to focus on nurturing and organizing the PoLitics section of the site, however my real love is HiStory?. I wrote the pages on OregoN, GladstoneOregon, and AlchemY. I am currently involved in copying in the 'A' articles in from the BritannicaPublicDomain text.
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)