[Home]History of Homer

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 11 . . (edit) December 2, 2001 10:39 am by (logged).188.192.xxx
Revision 10 . . November 12, 2001 12:25 am by Vicki Rosenzweig [made <nowiki>[[Linear B]]</nowiki> a link, fixed a typo]
Revision 9 . . November 11, 2001 6:59 pm by Hajhouse [homer was part of an oro-formulaic tradition]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
Homer is the poet to whom history has attibuted the Iliad and the Odyssey. According to Greek legends about his life, Homer was blind. Homer did not write the Homeric Hymns, which are other poems in the style of Homer.
Homer is the poet to whom history has attributed the Iliad and the Odyssey. According to Greek legends about his life, Homer was blind. Homer did not write the Homeric Hymns; these are other poems in the style of Homer.

Changed: 3c3
The poems appear to go back to at least the eighth century B.C.E., and were first written down at the command of the Athenian ruler Pisistratos?, who feared that they were being forgotten. He made a law that any bard or singer who came to Athens must recite as much as he knew of Homer for the Athenian scribes, who recorded each version and collated them into what we now know as the Iliad and Odyssey. Homer is also rumored to have written a third, comic, epic, but if it ever existed, no fragments of it have been found.
The poems appear to go back to at least the eighth century B.C.E., and were first written down at the command of the Athenian ruler Pisistratos?, who feared they were being forgotten. He made a law: any singer or bard who came to Athens had to recite all they knew of Homer for the Athenian scribes, who recorded each version and collated them into what we now call the Iliad and Odyssey.

Changed: 5,6c5
For a long time, humanist scholarship has debated whether an individual named Homer existed. Even if his existence is granted, questions remain about what he did. The two epic poems seem to be based on the assembly of legends that existed in some form for many years. Did the man compose the poems, or did he collect traditional verses? An analysis of the structure and vocabulary of the Iliad and Odyssey reveals that the poems consist of regular, repeating phrases; even entire verses repeat. It is suggested that the Iliad and Odyssey are oro-formulaic poems, composed on the spot by the poet using a collection of memorized traditional verses and phases. Such elaborate oral tradition, foreign to today's literate cultures, is is typical of epic poetry in a pre-literate culture. Looked at this way, Homer's distinction is that his performance was recorded. There may have been hundreds of lyric poets in Homer's tradition, who performed hundreds of versions of the epics, only one of
which was committed to writing and survived to this day.
Homer is also rumored to have written a third, comic, epic. But if it ever existed, no fragments of it have been found.

Changed: 8c7,13
All in all, the belief in the reality of an actual "Homer" may have more scholarly adherents now than in the 19th century. So little is known or even guessed of his actual life, however, that scholars joke that the poems "were not written by Homer, but by another man of the same name," and the classicist [Richmond Lattimore]?, author of a good poetic translation to English of both epics, once titled a paper "Homer: who was she?"
For centuries, scholars have debated whether an individual named "Homer" existed. If he did live, how did he live and compose his poems. The two epic poems seem to be based on the assembly of legends that existed in rough form for many years. Did the man compose the poems, or did he collect traditional verses?

An analysis of the structure and vocabulary of the Iliad and Odyssey shows that the poems consist of regular, repeating phrases; even entire verses repeat. Could the Iliad and Odyssey have been oro-formulaic poems, composed on the spot by the poet using a collection of memorized traditional verses and phases? Such elaborate oral tradition, foreign to today's literate cultures, is typical of epic poetry in a pre-literate culture.

Seen this way, Homer's distinction is that his performance was recorded. There may have been hundreds of lyric poets in Homer's day, who performed hundreds of versions of the epics, but only one of these was committed to writing and survived to this day.

All in all, the belief in the reality of an actual "Homer" may have more scholarly adherents now than in the 19th century. So little is known or even guessed of his actual life, that scholars joke the poems "were not written by Homer, but by another man of the same name," and the classicist [Richmond Lattimore]?, author of a good poetic translation to English of both epics, once called a paper "Homer: Who Was She?"

Changed: 12c17
The excavations of Heinrich Schliemann in the late 19th century began to convince scholars that there was a basis in historical reality for the Trojan War. Research into orally preserved epics in Serbo-croatian? and Turkic languages began to convince scholars that long poems could be preserved with consistency by oral cultures until someone bothered to write them down. The decipherment of Linear B in the 1950s by Michael Ventris and others convinced scholars that there was linguistic continuity between 13th century B.C. mainland Greek Mycenaean civilization and the Greek language of Homer.
The excavations of Heinrich Schliemann in the late 19th century began to convince scholars there was an historical basis for the Trojan War. Research into oral epics in Serbo-croatian? and Turkic languages began to convince scholars that long poems could be preserved with consistency by oral cultures until someone bothered to write them down. The decipherment of Linear B in the 1950s by Michael Ventris and others convinced scholars there was linguistic continuity between 13th century B.C. mainland Greek Mycenaean civilization and the Greek language of Homer.

Changed: 14c19
/Talk?
/Talk?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: