[Home]History of Wipe

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 8 . . (edit) September 6, 2001 2:22 pm by Koyaanis Qatsi
Revision 7 . . (edit) September 6, 2001 1:38 pm by Mike Dill [redirect]
Revision 6 . . (edit) September 6, 2001 9:52 am by Koyaanis Qatsi
Revision 5 . . September 6, 2001 3:41 am by Larry Sanger [lower-casing words that should be lowercased]
Revision 4 . . September 6, 2001 3:40 am by Larry Sanger
Revision 3 . . September 6, 2001 3:39 am by (logged).133.62.xxx
Revision 2 . . September 6, 2001 3:34 am by (logged).133.62.xxx
Revision 1 . . September 6, 2001 2:40 am by (logged).133.62.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 3c3
It is often aknowledged that using a wipe, rather than a simple cut or Dissolve is a stylistic choice that inherently makes the audience more "aware" of the film as a film, rather than a story. For example, George Lucas is famous for the sweeping use of Wipes in his Star Wars films, which help evoke a kinship to old serialized pulp sci-fi novels and serials.
It is often aknowledged that using a wipe, rather than a simple cut or dissolve is a stylistic choice that inherently makes the audience more "aware" of the film as a film, rather than a story. For example, George Lucas is famous for the sweeping use of Wipes in his Star Wars films, which help evoke a kinship to old serialized pulp sci-fi novels and serials.

Changed: 5c5
Wipes also can be used as syntactic tools, but are often frowned on. Some examples are the Star Wipe, Heart Wipe, [Matrix Wipe]?, and [Clock Wipe]?.
Wipes also can be used as syntactic tools, but are often frowned on. Some examples are the star wipe, heart wipe, [matrix wipe]?, and clock wipe.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: