[Home]History of Wikipedia approval mechanism

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 41 . . November 11, 2001 4:50 am by Aristotle
Revision 40 . . (edit) November 11, 2001 4:46 am by Aristotle
Revision 39 . . September 24, 2001 4:52 pm by Aristotle [* More comment]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 148c148
I think Aristotle's (got to change that nickname, guy! :-) ) proposal really pales beside Bryce's. If we are going to have a "community approval" process, Bryce's is far superior, because it allows us to "approve the approvers." Frankly, I couldn't give rat's patoot whether lots of people would approve of a given article. I want to know whether people who know about the subject (i.e., by definition, the people I'm calling experts) approve of it.
I think ...'s (got to change that nickname, guy! :-) ) proposal really pales beside Bryce's. If we are going to have a "community approval" process, Bryce's is far superior, because it allows us to "approve the approvers." Frankly, I couldn't give rat's patoot whether lots of people would approve of a given article. I want to know whether people who know about the subject (i.e., by definition, the people I'm calling experts) approve of it.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: