[Home]History of Theory of justification

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . September 25, 2001 9:06 am by Mark Christensen [A little more clean up]
Revision 3 . . September 25, 2001 8:52 am by Mark Christensen [Trying to make this a bit clearer, wikify, and remove bias.]
Revision 2 . . (edit) August 20, 2001 9:34 pm by AxelBoldt
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 7,9c7
Thus, justification is a normative notion. That means that it has to do with norms, rights, responsibilities, obligations, and so forth. A concept is normative iff it is a concept regarding or depending on the norms, or obligations and permissions (very broadly construed), involved in human conduct.

The concept of justification is definitely normative, because it is a concept regarding the norms of belief.
Thus, justification is a normative notion. That means that it has to do with norms, rights, responsibilities, obligations, and so forth. The standard deffinition is that a concept is normative iff it is a concept regarding or depending on the norms, or obligations and permissions (very broadly construed), involved in human conduct. It is gennerally accepted that the concept of justification is normative, because just because it is deffined as a concept regarding the norms of belief.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: