|
With the exception of the line about SUVs being buglies (which I didn't add, but didn't delete), I don't see a whole lot of bias difference between your rewrite of SUV and my version. I suppose there was the word rationalize in my write-up, but other than that I find your summary, frankly, insulting and wrong. --Belltower Then you are easily insulted. I don't see what you find wrong about it, though. Maybe you would care to explain. If you want me to explain why I rewrote it as I did, I can do that too. --Larry Sanger Your rewrite is fine; it just isn't significantly different in content. Saying "this is horribly biased" and then re-using 95% of it seems incongruous. Having been on the internet for 15 years, I merely note (but don't care about) things I consider insulting... others might not be so thick-skinned. --Belltower |
|
Someone might want to add a bit about them being capable of travelling in snow where other vehicles get stuck, helping transport emergency service workers, etc. : Except that I know personally numerous people who have gone the SUV route simply because they needed a capacious vehicle and couldn't stand the idea of driving a minivan. Heck, the aesthetics of the Toyota Previa -- still, to my eyes, the best-looking minivan -- were at least part of why I bought one. Cafe may have killed the large powerful sedan, admittedly. --Belltower |
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)