[Home]History of SSRI/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 11 . . October 23, 2001 6:09 am by Zundark
Revision 10 . . October 23, 2001 5:54 am by Stephen Gilbert
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 22c22,24
:I could be mistaken, but I believe a blanket statement such as "All trademarks are the property of their respective owners" would cover us legally. Jimmy should probably check with a lawyer, though. --STG
:I could be mistaken, but I believe a blanket statement such as "All trademarks are the property of their respective owners" would cover us legally. Jimmy should probably check with a lawyer, though. --STG

::Legally, I don't think even this is necessary. (If it is, then someone needs to tell Richard Stallman -- see [the GNU policy on trademarks].) I don't think LDC was talking about legal requirements, he was talking about not pissing off very rich people. --Zundark, 2001 Oct 22

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: