[Home]History of Prime Minister of Australia

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . (edit) September 28, 2001 3:42 pm by (logged).35.135.xxx [Typo]
Revision 6 . . (edit) September 26, 2001 6:20 pm by ManningBartlett
Revision 4 . . September 26, 2001 3:51 pm by (logged).9.128.xxx [added talk page]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
The office of Prime Minister is in practice the most powerful in the Commonwealth of Australia. By convention, the Prime Minister is the leader of the party or coalition which has the most seats in the lower house of the Federal Parliament, the House of Representatives. In times of constitutional crisis, however, this convention can be broken if neccessary; this has occured once, during the constitutional crisis of the 1970s, when Malcolm Fraser was appointed to replace Gough Whitlam.
The office of Prime Minister is in practice the most powerful political office in the Commonwealth of Australia. By convention, the Prime Minister is the leader of the party or coalition which has the most seats in the lower house of the Federal Parliament, the House of Representatives. In times of constitutional crisis, however, this convention can be broken if neccessary; this has occured once, during the constitutional crisis of the 1970s, when Malcolm Fraser was appointed to replace Gough Whitlam.

Changed: 9c9
The Governor-General is appointed by the Queen; by convention, she does appoints the person recommended to her by the Prime Minister. The Queen can also sack the Governor-General, which by convention she would do if the Prime Minister requested it. Since the Governor-General can sack the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister can (by advising the Queen to do so) sack the Governor-General, the possibilty arises of a race between the two to see who can sack the other first. However, thus far this has been a largely theoretical possibility, though it might have happened during the constitutional crisis of the 1970s, had the events at the time played out differently.
The Governor-General is appointed by the Queen; by convention she appoints the person recommended to her by the Prime Minister. The Queen can also sack the Governor-General, which by convention she would do if the Prime Minister requested it. Since the Governor-General can sack the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister can (by advising the Queen to do so) sack the Governor-General, the possibilty arises of a race between the two to see who can sack the other first. However, thus far this has been a largely theoretical possibility, though it might have happened during the constitutional crisis of the 1970s, had the events at the time played out differently.

Changed: 58c58
/Talk?
/Talk?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: