[Home]History of Political liberal/FAQ

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . March 31, 2001 2:21 am by (logged).210.13.xxx [Just talking]
Revision 3 . . March 31, 2001 2:17 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 3a4,5

I agree. Not just blatantly biased, but also factually questionable or at least highly idiosyncratic. For example, it claims that the liberal position is that all drugs be legalized, but that doesn't seem to be a major tenet of many (any?) liberal politicians or groups. Most would probably support legalizing marijuana, or at least making the penalties less severe, and they would of course support efforts to ensure that drugs abused by the rich (regular cocaine) are punished on an equal basis with drugs abused by the poor (crack cocaine). But that's hardly the same as the legalization proposed by the author.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: