[Home]History of Poker/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . September 5, 2001 6:30 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 3 . . September 5, 2001 3:46 am by Larry Sanger
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 12c12,15
I'm now totally convinced that we shouldn't aim at making all pages mailable. I think I did have a point, but I'm not sure best how to state it. --LMS
I'm now totally convinced that we shouldn't aim at making all pages mailable. I think I did have a point, but I'm not sure best how to state it. --LMS


It might make sense for "accessibility" (in many forms, including the ability to survive email) to be point of quality, just not necessarily a reqired one. Math is the real toughie--there's just no way to do it without the symbols, and so we need to have specialized methods. But the change you suggest to the one sentence on the poker page does make sense, so I reworded it. It's now a better article, in that it expresses exactly what it did before just as effectively, and now it is also less confusing when read as email or on Lynx or a speech browser, etc. It's the same issue with things like illustrations: if you can make the article make sense without them with little work, why not? But if you can't, don't lose any sleep over it. --LDC


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: