[Home]History of Plea bargain

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 3 . . (edit) July 26, 2001 6:09 pm by (logged).93.208.xxx
Revision 2 . . May 31, 2001 5:01 am by AyeSpy
Revision 1 . . May 31, 2001 4:39 am by (logged).154.13.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Added: 3a4,11

The reasons for plea bargains may be several. In many cases, prosecutors may have brought too serious a charge to fit the facts or available proof. On the other hand, the defendant may be conscious of his own guilt in the matter to a greater or lesser degree, and afraid of receiving too serious a conviction or too harsh a sentence.

In other cases, a defendant may have culpability with others in a criminal matter and at the same time have knowledge which will ensure the success of a broader or more significant prosecution. In such a case, in order to secure the defendant's willingness to testify for the prosecution in other cases, charges or sentencing in his own case may be offered to be lessened if he does, indeed cooperate fully with the prosecution.

In still other cases, prosecutors may be convinced that they have the right defendant and a completely accurate charge as to what crime(s) he committed, and yet the evidence to secure a conviction may be questionable or lacking. It is of benefit to both parties (prosecutor and defendant) to arrange a resolution of the matter without either side taking the chance that the case, once submitted fully to a judge jury, would go completely against them.

Overall, plea bargains serve to ease the caseload of overburdened justice systems, and form a framework wherein the accused and his accusers can reach an agreement which settles the case once and for all, in what is hoped will be a spirit of fairness.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: