[Home]History of Ontological argument/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 6 . . October 20, 2001 10:46 pm by (logged).253.128.xxx [Repeated sentence]
Revision 5 . . September 25, 2001 10:55 pm by Mark Christensen [Refactoring /talk page]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 41a42,44



The following passage appears twice on the page: "Obviously Anselm thought this argument was valid and persuasive, and it still has many defenders, but there have also been a number of people who claim that the ontological argument, at least as Anselm articulated it, does not stand up to strict logical scrutiny." Which occurence should be removed?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: