History of Old Testament/Talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 7c7

:You're right, they did not, RK. We need to decide what to do with different terms for similar rites and liturgical phenomena. I do agree that in this case there is little difference. However I still think it should have two entries, or at least a double title. Someone familiar with Christianity will no doubt have trouble finding the Old Testament under 'Tanach'. The case of Eucharist/Communion? as I see it deserves two separate entries, since the liturgical practice of each version of the 'Last Supper' and the theological doctrines behind them differ significantly, and could each probably be regarded typical of Roman Catholicism and of Protestantism.--TK

	Revision 5 . . December 4, 2001 8:58 am by (logged).211.66.xxx
	Revision 4 . . December 4, 2001 7:58 am by RK [We need to consider this point. The Tanakh really is the Old Testament. If not, what precisely do you mean?]
	Revision 3 . . December 4, 2001 3:35 am by (logged).146.101.xxx [which Christian scholars think the NT doesn't apply to Jews and why?]
	Revision 2 . . December 4, 2001 2:28 am by BenBaker *[my opinion]**
	Revision 1 . . (edit) December 3, 2001 6:35 pm by Stephen Gilbert [moved from main page]