[Home]History of Netherlands/Drugs policy

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 11 . . (edit) November 7, 2001 12:50 am by AxelBoldt
Revision 10 . . November 6, 2001 10:30 pm by Herman [improved (IMHO) explanation of gedoogbeleid]
Revision 9 . . November 5, 2001 8:33 am by Anatoly Vorobey
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 9c9,12
Note that cannabis is an illegal substance in the Netherlands. Legally you could in principle be arrested and convicted of drug possession, but in practice you are not. The Dutch Ministery of Justice simply uses an intentional facility in dutch law to institute a "gedoogbeleid?" with regard to softdrugs. "Gedogen" is a common Dutch practice: an official tolerance of a forbidden activity. It is used to keep control of activity which is considered harmful to society by the Dutch government.
Note that cannabis is an illegal substance in the Netherlands, although possession for personal use is only an offense punishable with a fine. Legally you could in principle be prosecuted for drug possession, but in practice you are not. This is because the Dutch Ministery of Justice applies a "gedoogbeleid?" (tolerance policy) with regard to softdrugs: an official set of guidelines telling public prosecutors under which conditions not to prosecute an activity that is officially forbidden. "Gedoogbeleid" is in fact the institutionalised version of a practice commonly found in other countries, namely that law enforcement officers have to make priorities on which offenses are important enough to spend limited resources on. Proponents of "gedoogbeleid" say therefore that with a gedoogbeleid, there is better unity in law protection in practice, than without it. Opponents of the Dutch gedoogbeleid however state that since there has been de facto legalisation of soft drugs for so many years, that the state of law would be better served with a real legalisation.



/DrugTalk?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: