History of Montana/Talk

	Revision 2 . . September 22, 2001 4:25 pm by Larry Sanger
	Revision 1 . . September 22, 2001 4:24 pm by Larry Sanger

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1

I can't say I much like stubs like this. I don't think stubs must be always [the perfect stub]?, but golly, surely it doesn't do much good just to say that Montana's a U.S. state. What's the purpose of doing that? I personally would rather see five three-sentence stubs than fifteen single sentence-fragment stubs. That's just me--I'm just kvetching. Continue on, if it pleases you. :-) --LMS

I can't say I much like stubs like this. I don't think stubs must be always [the perfect stub]?, but golly, surely it doesn't do much good just to say that Montana's a U.S. state. What's the purpose of doing that? I personally would rather see five three-sentence stubs than fifteen single sentence-fragment stubs. That's just me--I'm just kvetching. Continue on, if it pleases you. :-) At least, please, make the stubs full sentences with the subject bolded (as I've done here with the Montana article. --LMS