[Home]History of Mesa programming language/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 11 . . November 11, 2001 4:58 am by Aristotle
Revision 10 . . September 21, 2001 6:12 pm by Aristotle
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Removed: 7,12d6
: drj, I think there is an opportunity for a seperate page for the stack-based Xerox workstations such as the Dandelion (8010). As for the relationship between Ada and Mesa see [1].

: NickelKnowledge, People generally react this way - the connection does exist, see [2] for more details.

: -- Artistotle


Removed: 15d8
: This was passed to me as a piece of oral tradition while was at Xerox so thanks for encouraging me to track down the actual details -- Aristotle

Changed: 17,19c10
Well this is all very good. Someone wrote that cedar came before mesa, but http://www.parc.xerox.com/hist-lst.html claims it was the other way round, so I changed it. That also accords with my very vague 3rd or 4th info. Cedar was designed to interop more easily with C and Modula wasn't it? --drj

I wrote that Cedar came before Mesa. As a software developer and part of the Xerox' European SDD presence I knew Cedar as Xerox PARC's favourite form of Mesa and I believed that it preceded it. A good correction. -- Aristotle
Well this is all very good. Someone wrote that cedar came before mesa, but http://www.parc.xerox.com/hist-lst.html claims it was the other way round, so I changed it. That also accords with my very vague 3rd or 4th info. Cedar was designed to interop more easily with C and Modula wasn't it? --drj

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: