History of Logical fallacy/Talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 62a63,64

I think this is not so much a fallacy as an unsound argument (or is it invalid argument?). It results from using a different definition of a word than your opponent in a logical debate uses. Thus, in the above example the first speaker's definition of "Jew" includes "does not eat pork." The second speaker's definition does not include this. --KamikazeArchon

	Revision 19 . . December 15, 2001 9:54 am by KamikazeArchon [this is a definition problem]
	Revision 18 . . December 15, 2001 7:28 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
	Revision 17 . . December 15, 2001 6:43 am by (logged).128.91.xxx
	Revision 16 . . December 15, 2001 6:26 am by The Epopt [bad example]
	Revision 15 . . December 15, 2001 3:53 am by Alex Kennedy
	Revision 14 . . September 27, 2001 5:43 am by Zundark [master dixit?]