[Home]History of Law of non-contradiction

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . (edit) September 24, 2001 6:30 pm by Zundark [links]
Revision 3 . . April 3, 2001 4:58 am by Larry Sanger
Revision 2 . . (edit) April 3, 2001 3:52 am by (logged).207.223.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
Variously formulated, the gist of the Law of Noncontradiction is that a proposition and its denial cannot both be true at the same time and "in the same respect." If we're being careful, we won't formulate it this way, in terms of truth (it might then might be confused with ThePrincipleOfBivalence). Instead, we'll say the law is: for any proposition P, it is not both the case that P and not-P. In Aristotle's formulation: "One cannot say of something that it is and that it is not in the same respect and at the same time."
Variously formulated, the gist of the Law of Noncontradiction is that a proposition and its denial cannot both be true at the same time and "in the same respect." If we're being careful, we won't formulate it this way, in terms of truth (it might then might be confused with the principle of bivalence). Instead, we'll say the law is: for any proposition P, it is not both the case that P and not-P. In Aristotle's formulation: "One cannot say of something that it is and that it is not in the same respect and at the same time."

Changed: 3c3
The Law of Noncontradiction is almost universally affirmed by philosophers. See also the law of excluded middle and ThePrincipleOfBivalence.
The Law of Noncontradiction is almost universally affirmed by philosophers. See also the law of excluded middle and the principle of bivalence.

Removed: 11,20d10



Here's a simple example:

I state this to be true:
If it is raining, I am wearing blue socks.

If I am wearing blue socks, you cannot conclude that
it is raining because I did not state that blue socks
are worn only when it is raining.

Added: 21a12,13


/Talk?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: