[Home]History of Hip hop/talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 6 . . (edit) August 1, 2001 2:15 am by Buttonius
Revision 5 . . May 28, 2001 1:18 am by Wathiik
Revision 4 . . May 28, 2001 1:17 am by Wathiik
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
A few questions: is the (Toop 60) meant to be a reference to David Toop's _The rap attack: American jive to New York hip hop_ (London: Pluto, 1984), or to _Rap attack 2: African rap to global hip hop_ (London ; New York: Serpent's Tail, 1994)? Also, the entry also has two places where it says "(see " followed by an end parenthesis, with no work cited. The Toop books are supposed to be good reading; I'd be interested to see the other references too.
A few questions: is the (Toop 60) meant to be a reference to David Toop's The rap attack: American jive to New York hip hop (London: Pluto, 1984), or to Rap attack 2: African rap to global hip hop (London; New York: Serpent's Tail, 1994)? Also, the entry also has two places where it says "(see " followed by an end parenthesis, with no work cited. The Toop books are supposed to be good reading; I'd be interested to see the other references too.

Changed: 5,6c5,6
it refers to the latter. i'll include a full bibliography.

it refers to the lattes. the Toop book(s) are / is good, however, it's very New-York-centric. still, probably the best introduction to hip hop.



Changed: 10c10
oh yeah, i think KRS One also uses this definition. I think what it shows is that there are rappers who aren't really part of hip hop culture, and insofar it is a useful definition. But on the other hand, it doesn't say anything about the music and it is rather - well - negative and evaluating, so for - well - musicologists and journalists (I may be one of the latter breed) it is not a very useful definition. Basically, this definition means that a) commercial rap (ie, 'the kind of rap we don't like') is not hip hop whereas the kind of rap that 'we like' is hip hop...
oh yeah, i think KRS One also uses this definition. I think what it shows is that there are rappers who aren't really part of hip hop culture, and insofar it is a useful definition. But on the other hand, it doesn't say anything about the music and it is rather - well - negative and evaluating, so for - well - musicologists and journalists (I may be one of the latter breed) it is not a very useful definition. Basically, this definition means that a) commercial rap (ie, 'the kind of rap we don't like') is not hip hop whereas the kind of rap that 'we like' is hip hop...

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: