[Home]History of Folk music/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . September 23, 2001 12:10 am by (logged).101.175.xxx [Skiffle/Beatles request]
Revision 9 . . (edit) September 18, 2001 11:22 am by Koyaanis Qatsi
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 18c18,20
I like the new additions--lots of good new information here. I added some more. The problem now is that the article is rambling and disorganized, and I am probably not the best person to organize and clarify it. BTW, using the word "purist," without the quotes, makes it sound as if the authors of the article are not purists, which we don't want to imply. :-) See neutral point of view. --LMS
I like the new additions--lots of good new information here. I added some more. The problem now is that the article is rambling and disorganized, and I am probably not the best person to organize and clarify it. BTW, using the word "purist," without the quotes, makes it sound as if the authors of the article are not purists, which we don't want to imply. :-) See neutral point of view. --LMS


Perhaps someone who knows the facts :-) could add in "Skiffle" music, from whence the Beatles sprang, which was evidently a British folk form in the 1950's. Certainly the Beatles stole (er, utilised!) many folk forms in their music.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: