[Home]History of Existence

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . August 16, 2001 3:31 am by AxelBoldt [link to first-order logic]
Revision 9 . . (edit) June 2, 2001 2:01 am by KoyaanisQatsi
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 7c7
Frege? and Russell, among many others, for similar reasons are well-known for their view that 'exists' is not a (logical) predicate?, or more precisely, not a first-order predicate--or, perhaps equivalently (and perhaps not), that existence is not a property. This has become the dominant but not the universal view in twentieth-century and contemporary Anglo-American philosophy. But, as G. E. Moore pointed out in an early essay, it is a matter of some difficulty to say what exactly what this view amounts to. [This too needs to be greatly expanded, and probably made into its own article.]
Frege? and Russell, among many others, for similar reasons are well-known for their view that 'exists' is not a (logical) predicate?, or more precisely, not a first-order predicate--or, perhaps equivalently (and perhaps not), that existence is not a property. This has become the dominant but not the universal view in twentieth-century and contemporary Anglo-American philosophy. But, as G. E. Moore pointed out in an early essay, it is a matter of some difficulty to say what exactly what this view amounts to. [This too needs to be greatly expanded, and probably made into its own article.]

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: