[Home]History of Cultural anthropology

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 17 . . December 18, 2001 8:49 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 16 . . (edit) December 18, 2001 8:35 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 15 . . December 17, 2001 5:24 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 14 . . December 15, 2001 1:42 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 13 . . December 13, 2001 6:25 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 12 . . December 13, 2001 5:08 am by (logged).235.232.xxx
Revision 11 . . December 3, 2001 1:36 am by (logged).76.2.xxx [Ainu]
Revision 10 . . (edit) November 10, 2001 3:13 am by The Epopt [made the first line a sentence, added link to phys-anthro]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 4c4,6
Modern socio-cultural anthropology has its origins in 19th century "ethnology." Ethnology involves the systematic comparison of human societies. Scholars like Sir E.B. Tylor and Sir J.G. Frazer in England, and L.H. Morgan in the United States, worked mostly with materials collected by others -- usually missionaries, explorers, or colonial officials -- and are today called "arm-chair anthropologists." Ethnologists were especially interested in why people living in different parts of the world sometimes had similar beliefs and practices. Ethnologists in the 19th century were divided: some argued that different groups must somehow have learned from one another, however indirectly; in other words, they argued that cultural traits spread from one place to another, or "diffused." Others argued that different groups were capable of inventing similar beliefs and practices independently. Some of those who advocated "independent invention" additionally supposed that similarities meant that different groups had passed through the same stages of cultural evolution. 20th century ethnologists largely reject the notion that all human societies must pass through the same stages in the same order; they instead have argued that such similarities reflected similar adaptations to similar environments.
Modern socio-cultural anthropology has its origins in 19th century "ethnology." Ethnology involves the systematic comparison of human societies. Scholars like Sir E.B. Tylor and Sir J.G. Frazer in England worked mostly with materials collected by others -- usually missionaries, explorers, or colonial officials -- and are today called "arm-chair anthropologists." Ethnologists were especially interested in why people living in different parts of the world sometimes had similar beliefs and practices. Ethnologists in the 19th century were divided: some, like William Graham Sumner, argued that different groups must somehow have learned from one another, however indirectly; in other words, they argued that cultural traits spread from one place to another, or "diffused." Others argued that different groups were capable of inventing similar beliefs and practices independently. Some of those who advocated "independent invention," like Lewis Henry Morgan, additionally supposed that similarities meant that different groups had passed through the same stages of cultural evolution.

20th century ethnologists largely reject the notion that all human societies must pass through the same stages in the same order. Some, like Julian Steward, have instead argued that such similarities reflected similar adaptations to similar environments. Others, like Claude Levi-Strauss, have argued that they reflect fundamental similarities in the structure of human thought.

Changed: 10c12
Today socio-cultural anthropology is still dominated by ethnography. Nevertheless, many contemporary socio-cultural anthropologists have rejected earlier models of ethnography that treated local cultures as bounded and isolated. These anthropologists are still concerned with the distinct ways people in different locales experience and understand their lives, but they often argue that one cannot understand these particular ways of life solely in the local context; one must analyze them in the context of regional or even global political and economic relations.
Today socio-cultural anthropology is still dominated by ethnography. Nevertheless, many contemporary socio-cultural anthropologists have rejected earlier models of ethnography that treated local cultures as bounded and isolated. These anthropologists are still concerned with the distinct ways people in different locales experience and understand their lives, but they often argue that one cannot understand these particular ways of life solely in the local context; one must analyze them in the context of regional or even global political and economic relations. Notable proponents of this approach are Arjun Appadurai, James Clifford, Jean Comaroff, John Comaroff, James Ferguson, Akhil Gupta, George Marcus, Sidney Mintz, Michael Taussig, Joan Vincent, and Eric Wolf.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: