[Home]History of Copenhagen interpretation

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 12 . . (edit) December 20, 2001 11:38 am by CYD
Revision 11 . . (edit) December 12, 2001 10:44 am by CYD
Revision 10 . . October 2, 2001 8:44 pm by Carey Evans [new URL for Physics FAQ]
Revision 9 . . August 22, 2001 7:49 am by AxelBoldt [significance of Aspect's results]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 3c3
# The probability statements made by quantum mechanics are irreducible in the sense that they don't just reflect our limited knowledge of some hidden variables. In classical physics, probabilities were used to describe the outcome of rolling a die, even though the process was thought to be deterministic. Probabilities were used to substitute for complete knowledge. By contrast, the Copenhagen interpretation holds that in quantum mechanics, measurement outcomes are fundamentally indeterministic.
# The probability statements made by quantum mechanics are irreducible in the sense that they don't just reflect our limited knowledge of some hidden variables. In classical physics, probabilities were used to describe the outcome of rolling a die, even though the process was thought to be deterministic. Probabilities were used to substitute for complete knowledge. By contrast, the Copenhagen interpretation holds that in quantum mechanics, measurement outcomes are fundamentally indeterministic.

Changed: 12c12
Schrödinger's cat was originally intended as an example to show how absurd the model was
Schrödinger's cat was originally intended as an example to show how absurd the model was

Changed: 18c18
* [Physics FAQ section about Bell's inequality]
* [Physics FAQ section about Bell's inequality]

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: