[Home]History of Carbon chauvinism/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . December 4, 2001 8:56 am by (logged).128.161.xxx
Revision 3 . . December 4, 2001 8:48 am by (logged).192.137.xxx
Revision 2 . . December 4, 2001 2:32 am by (logged).109.250.xxx
Revision 1 . . December 4, 2001 1:30 am by (logged).153.24.xxx [thanks for broadening my horizons.]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 4a5,6
On the other hand, is it really chauvenism if the person has a good, solid reason for his or her bias? :)


Changed: 8c10
Imagine this. When a carbon based life form jumps into a pool of magma in a volcano, it just burns to ash and dies. When a silicon based life form (assuming there were one) leaves the confine of the magma, it just solidifies and dies too. No scientist can enter the magma and survive, then how can anyone disprove the possiblity that non-carbon based life exists in the center of the earth? Likewise for hostile world such as venus, or even the core of a star, there may be life forms that we don't and will never recognize.
Imagine this. When a carbon based life form jumps into a pool of magma in a volcano, it just burns to ash and dies. When a silicon based life form (assuming there were one) leaves the confine of the magma, it just solidifies and dies too. No scientist can enter the magma and survive, then how can anyone disprove the possiblity that non-carbon based life exists in the center of the earth? Likewise for hostile world such as venus, or even the core of a star, there may be life forms that we don't and will never recognize.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: