Wikipedia: History of Book of Isaiah

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1,5c1,12

\Isaiah, The Book of\
consists of prophecies delivered (Isa. 1) in the reign of Uzziah
(1-5), (2) of Jotham (6), (3) Ahaz (7-14:28), (4) the first half
of Hezekiah's reign (14:28-35), (5) the second half of
Hezekiah's reign (36-66). Thus, counting from the fourth year

Isaiah is a book of the Bible in the
Old Testament, containing prophecies attributed
to Isaiah.

It
consists of prophecies delivered (Isa. 1) in the reign of
Uzziah?
(1-5), (2) of Jotham? (6), (3) Ahaz? (7-14:28), (4) the first half
of Hezekiah's reign (14:28-35), (5) the second half of
Hezekiah's reign (36-66).

Thus, counting from the fourth year

Added: 11a19

Changed: 14,15c22,27

and King. (2.) Four chapters are historical (36-39), relating to
the times of Hezekiah. (3.) Prophetical (40-66), Israel's enemy

and King.

(2.) Four chapters are historical (36-39), relating to
the times of Hezekiah.

(3.) Prophetical (40-66), Israel's enemy

Changed: 23c35

German writer at the close of the last century. There are other

German writer at the close of the 18th century. There are other

Changed: 28,29c40,45

book. The considerations which have led to such a result are
various: (1.) They cannot, as some say, conceive it possible

book.

The considerations which have led to such a result are
various:

(1.) They cannot, as some say, conceive it possible

Changed: 31c47,48

and the exploits of a prince called Cyrus, who would set the

and the exploits of a prince called
Cyrus, who would set the

Added: 32a50

Changed: 35c53,55

and (3) that there is such a difference between the style and

and

(3) that there is such a difference between the style and

Changed: 38c58,60

lead to the conclusion that there were at least two Isaiahs. But

lead to the conclusion that there were at least two Isaiahs.

But

Changed: 43c65

prophecies were uttered will sufficiently account for this.

prophecies were uttered can sufficiently account for this.

Changed: 45,46c67,68

The arguments in favour of the unity of the book are quite
conclusive. When the LXX. version was made (about B.C. 250) the

There are arguments in favour of the unity of the book. When the
Septuagint version was made (about B.C. 250) the

Changed: 49c71

of our Lord the book existed in the form in which we now have

of Jesus the book existed in the form in which we now have

Changed: 59,65c81

origin. The theory therefore of a double authorship of the book,
much less of a manifold authorship, cannot be maintained. The
book, with all the diversity of its contents, is one, and is, we
believe, the production of the great prophet whose name it
bears.

origin.

Changed: 68c84

Initial text from Easton's Bible Dictionary, 1897 -- Please update as needed

	Revision 2 . . October 3, 2001 9:48 am by Alan Millar [wikify]
	Revision 1 . . October 3, 2001 9:30 am by (logged).99.203.xxx [Initial text from Easton's Bible Dictionary, 1897 -- please update as needed]