[Home]History of Basic tastes

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . (edit) June 22, 2001 3:03 am by KoyaanisQatsi
Revision 3 . . (edit) June 22, 2001 3:00 am by WojPob
Revision 1 . . June 22, 2001 2:35 am by Phillip2
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
Humans appear to be receptive to relatively few chemical species as tastes. This contrasts markedly with the sense of smell where very large numbers of different species can be differentiated.
Humans taste sensory organs, called taste buds, appear to be receptive to relatively few chemical species as tastes. This contrasts markedly with the sense of smell, where very large numbers of different species can be differentiated.

Changed: 3,4c3
There were originally thought to be four basic tastes, which
are :-
There were originally thought to be four basic tastes, which are:

Changed: 6,9c5,8
1) Salt which is produced by the presence of [sodium chloride]?.
2) Sweetness which is produced by the presence of one of several sugars.
3) Sourness, which is produced by acridity?
4) Bitterness...which I am not sure about!
* Saltiness, produced by the presence of [sodium chloride]? (and to a lesser degree other salts).
* Sweetness, produced by the presence of sugars.
* Sourness, produced by acids.
* Bitterness, produced by alkaloids and other chemicals.

Changed: 11c10,14
In recent years a fifth taste has become widely although not universally accepted. It doesn't actually have a common name, but is sensitivity to monosodium glutamate (MSG).
In recent years a fifth taste, often described by the Japanese word Umami, has become widely although not universally accepted. It is produced by the free glutamate?s commonly found in fermented and aged foods, and in the additive MSG (monosodium glutamate).

For many years, books on the physiology of human taste contained diagrams of the tongue showing levels of sensitivity to different tastes in different regions. There is no scientific foundation for these "maps", which were based on a misinterpretation of old research.

/Talk?

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: