[Home]History of Australia/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 3 . . November 6, 2001 5:17 pm by Simon J Kissane [why i deleted U.S.-centric content]
Revision 2 . . November 6, 2001 5:16 pm by ManningBartlett [SJK has done the right thing]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 5a6,10



(Thanks to whoever wrote the above reply while I was writing this.) Well, why not then add a comparison to every country in the world? There are only around 189 of them. That should clog up the article with a few pages of comparisons. We can't compare to everyone, so to be fair compare to none. The CIA world factbook can do that because the primary intended market for their product is Americans; Wikipedia aims to be more global than that.

Besides, the only readers that sort of information is likely to be useful to is Americans. While the comparison in this particular article isn't that bad, comparing it to the size of the U.S., other CIA world factbook entries compare states to the size of Connecticut or Delaware; frankly I wouldn't have the slightest clue how big those U.S. states are, and most of the people in the world wouldn't either. -- SJK]

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: