This tree doesn't have much to do with cladistics. The splits aren't binary and no explanation is given for their arrangement. It's really more a phylogenetic tree. I also think this might be a bad idea in general because nobody really knows how the lower groups are arranged, and most of the higher ones will be discussed in a different article. What do we plan to put here that won't be contained in
Monera,
Archaea,
Eukaryota,
Protista,
Plantae,
Fungi, or
Animalia, with more room for details and explanations? Not meaning to be negative... --
Josh Grosse