[Home]Stephen King/Talk

HomePage | Stephen King | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 7
I changed most of these titles back from "Stephen King/*" to "*" because most of the titles are distinctive enough that they don't need any further clarification, and having to type the "Stephen King/" bit to link to them is cumbersome. I did leave "Carrie" as "[Stephen King/Carrie]?" because of the novel by Theodor Dreiser by the same name; I also left "Danse Macabre" further clarified because of the actual dance. "The Shining" does not need to be further clarified because the term is one Stephen King made up himself, and the movie is of course based on the book, with insufficient variation (IMHO) to warrant separate entries. Of course someone later can come in and prove me wrong with two detailed entries. "Stand By Me" is "[Rob Reiner/Stand by Me]?" because of the song by Ben E. King which the movie gets its title from.
I have put in a number of write-ups for his novels as subpages to Stephen King, and will continue to do so. Putting some of them as subpages and some outside seems very stupid.

The books are clearly by King, so they're not a problem. The films could be listed separately if desired, since they're not the creation of one person. I haven't written about any of the films at any length, though. --Pinkunicorn


"Putting some of them as subpages and some outside seems very stupid."
Well then, that's neither the first nor the last stupid idea I've had. I don't think there's any argument that the novels are by Stephen King; my point was that most have distinctive enough titles that it's not necessary to make them subpages, especially since most of them have also penetrated the culture enough that further identification is not necessary (for instance, Cujo, The Shining, The Stand, etc.) I took exception with Carrie, as I said, because of the Dreiser novel. I imagine you must want to make The Taming of the Shrew a subpage of William Shakespeare. :-) --KQ
If I did the Shakespeare pages from scratch I probably would, yes. Someone would surely put up redirects all over the place for me. ;-) I promise I won't be moving any Shakespeare stuff around, though.

For King, I think there are interesting things to say about the film versions as compared to the novels, so having a separate set of pages for the films is good. There tends to be differences in plot (perhaps this problem is smaller with Shakespeare). Also, the films are made by lots and lots of people so it's not as obvious what person/entity to put it under. Perhaps the director? Perhaps the screenwriter? Perhaps the author of the novel it is based on (if there is one)?

(Unrelated: KQ, when you add content, why do you flag it as a minor edit so it doesn't show up in the changes list? I just found this by accident.)


HomePage | Stephen King | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited September 3, 2001 1:12 am by Koyaanis Qatsi (diff)
Search: