A very welcome newcomer to the Wikipedia, who I hope will write quite a bit about the history of anarchism. :-) --
Jimbo Wales
I notice that on
Traditional anarchism/Talk you disdain any attempt at neutrality with epithets like "emotionally unengaged" and "dishonest". Here's a question for you: if I am editing the article on your hero,
Noam Chomsky, and I fail to mention the fact that he is an apologist for mass-murdering psychopath
Pol Pot, am I being dishonest, or is it just possible that I have the capacity to recognize the intellectual achievements of someone I consider a despicable human being for what they are, while keeping my personal feelings to myself? --
LDC
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)