[Home]Mohs scale of mineral hardness

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 9
Mohs scale of mineral hardness was created by the German [Frederich Mohs]?. He based it on ten readily available minerals. The scale is not linear, for example corundum is twice as hard as topaz.

HardnessMineralAbsolute Hardness
1
Talc?
1
2
Gypsum?
3
3
Calcite?
9
4
Fluorite?
21
5
Apatite?
48
6
Orthoclase?
72
7
Quartz
100
8
Topaz?
200
9
Corundum
400
10
Diamond
1500

The table has been extended

HardnessMineral
1
Liquid
2
Gypsum
3
Calcite
4
Fluorite
5
Apatite
6
Orthoclase
7
Vitreous pure silica?
8
Quartz
9
Topaz
10
Garnet?
11
Fuzed zirconia?
12
Fuzed alumina?
13
Silicon carbide?
14
Boron carbide
15
Diamond

Question: if the scale isn't linear is there a linear scale that geologists prefer to use? And what exactly is 'absolute hardness'? How is hardness defined (we know what it is intuitively, but what is its physical definition?) Are there SI units for hardness? -- SJK

There is no absolute hardness scale. No units for hardness either. As for what "hardness" really is, I think that is an open question. It would certainly be related to [fracture toughness]?, but that defies analysis as well, relying on laboratory testing and depending on the geometry of the specimen.

Isn't part of the definition of hardness the scratch test (if you can scratch something with something else, that something else is the harder of the two)?

Thats the point of the Mohs scale. Frankly, the most useful materials for hardness testing in the field are fingernails (hardness 2-3) and pocket knives (hardness 5-6). Used in conjunction with luster, crystal habit and color, fingernails and pocket knives do a pretty good job.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited November 6, 2001 11:42 am by 198.144.199.xxx (diff)
Search: