OK - even though I love writing editing, I also love reading stuff that is totally out of my field, but is well-written, balanced, and comprehensive. So I decided on a whim to create the "article of the week" award, to recognise great collaborative (or even individual) work, and also to act as a resource for articles which have nothing in common except being "very good".
If this idea offends you, click here and do something else. Please understand that the purpose of this page is simply "Something to do". It does not purport to say anything about the overall standard of writing, nor does it seek to offer guidelines on where Wikipedia is heading. You should nominate and vote on an article because you thought - "Hey - I liked that".
The "rules" as such.
- four articles will be submitted each week for voting. Threse will be selected by an as-yet-undetermined process (possibly my, or someone else's whim).
- You may vote simply by editing this page and increasing the score number by 1. Please vote only once - this is the honour system.
- By voting you are stating that you have surveyed all four nominated articles and are not just voting because you like the title.
- Winners will be declared on Sundays, or when I get around to it.
- You may submit any article you like to the "future nominations" section below.
- All previous winners are disqualified from future selection. They will be placed in the "Previous Winners" section.
This week's nominations and voting.
note - for this week, I chose four articles because I liked them. I then voted for Einstein because it was my favourite.
- Albert Einstein - score 1
- Anarcho-capitalism - score 0
- Phases of matter - score 0
- Sapir-Whorf hypothesis - score 0
Future nominations
Previous Winners
/Talk
See also
Wikipedia/Article a day queue
Brilliant prose
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)