There have been only a few ethical egoists among professional philosophers, but in the wake of Ayn Rand's nonfiction, there have been a number of attempts to make ethical egoism widely respectable. The consensus among professional philosophers seems to be that the view is implausible to begin with and that those who advocate it seriously (as "enlightened egoists") do so only at the expense of redefining what self-interest? amounts to (including, as it is made to do, the interests of some other people or all other people at some times).
As Nietzsche (in Beyond Good and Evil) and [Alasdair Macintyre]? (in After Virtue) are famous for pointing out, the ancient Greeks did not associate morality? with altruism in the way that post-Christian [Western civilization]? has done. Consequently, it is sometimes said that Greeks like Aristotle (for whom pride was a virtue) were ethical egoists. It would be more accurate, perhaps, to say that the issue of altruism vs. egoism simply did not arise for them in the way that it does for us, or for some of us. Aristotle's view, for example, is that we have duties ourselves as well as to other people (e.g., friends) and the polis as a whole.
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)