[Home]Chaos theory/Talk

HomePage | Chaos theory | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 8
I don't know if the butterfly should really have its own page as it is only an example of chaos theory


Does anyone here besides me think that fractals deserve some mention in the article?


Fractals could indeed be mentioned if strange attractors where also mentioned. I'd do it myself if it weren't because someone else seems to be editing the page right now (concurrent editing is a pain, even under WikiWiki :).

Regarding the Lorenz attractor, take a pick on http://www.google.com/search?q=Lorenz+attractor.

--Filip Larsen


Please tell me that real academics don't use the word "dynamical". The "ic" and "al" suffixes mean the same thing (they both mean "pertaining to"). It's just like nails on a chalkboard to me, especially considering that looking the word up in a dictinoary yields the definition "see dynamic".

Real academics might not use the word, but mathematicians certainly do. "Dynamical systems" is what it's called everywhere. --Axelboldt

HomePage | Chaos theory | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited September 25, 2001 1:02 pm by AxelBoldt (diff)
Search: