Philosophers have distinguished between two kinds of knowledge,
a priori and
a posteriori. A priori knowledge is defined as knowledge which is warranted by reference to reason alone, without any reference to any external (to reason) experience at all. A more formal definition would be:
A belief is justified a priori iff its ultimate justifiers do not include sense-perception.
A posteriori knowledge is just all of the other knowledge, which is justified or warranted only after (posterior to) reference to some knowledge derived from sense perception.
Old content moved to /Talk because most of it wasn't about a priori or a posteriori knowlege, but please feel free to move relivant content back here.