Maybe it's just me, but I find the following way of indicating headings unintuitive:
A collection of work by
JRR Tolkien,
The Silmarillion is published posthumously by his son, Christopher.
Usually, a bullet is used for a listed item, not to indicate a heading. One more ordinary convention would rewrite the above as follows:
Arts and Entertainment
Books?
A collection of work by JRR Tolkien, The Silmarillion is published posthumously by his son, Christopher.
Something like that, anyway.
By the way, I really don't see what interest there is in having lyrics from Clash songs on Wikipedia. :-) Again, maybe it's just me... :-) --LMS
Two approaches:
- single page factoid list of information contained on other pages (e.g., Nobel prize, academy awards) along with other summary information
- just the summary information without links to academy awards, nobel prizes, etc.
It would get really cluttered when you add:
- superbowl
- world series
- wimbledon (sp?)
- nascar
- golf (masters, ryder cup, etc)
- grammys
- tonys
I vote for summary information only and not all of the factoids that are contained in other lists.
Do this give us a feature list like?
'GREP [page title]? "string"'
which includes one or more lines from a page within the currently being viewed page.
Selective include/partial include of pages may bog wiki down too much especially on a large scale.
As far as the clash 1977 song, just mentioning the album would be enough...see the page on the clash for real info.
Also, only 'significant' books/music should be included. That would be accomplished by 'popular' vote in many people reviewing/changing the page.
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)