First, I want to compliment the authors on a well written and interesting article! I would also like clarification of the following sentence: :And though there has been a great deal of argument about the relative weights that reason and observation should have, as well as significant refinements in both logic and observational methods, philosophers for two and a half centuries are basically united in the use of the very method of the pre-Socratics. To which two and a half centuries are you referring? Or do you mean the two and a half millennia since the Pre-Socratics? --Matt Stoker --- I should have said "two and a half millennia". The text of the page has been changed. |
First, I want to compliment the authors on a well written and interesting article! --Matt Stoker |
I left it where it was, but created redirects from presocratic, and presocratics which should take care of the non-intuitive link problem. Though perhaps we should have a link from pre-socratic?. I really don't want to clutter everything up with redirects, but I think it better to have these than to end up with redundant pages because people didn't know about the correct page name. MRC |
I left it where it was, but created redirects from presocratic, and presocratics which should take care of the non-intuitive link problem. Though perhaps we should have a link from pre-socratic?. I really don't want to clutter everything up with redirects, but I think it better to have these than to end up with redundant pages because people didn't know about the correct page name. MRC |