[Home]Parmenides

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Difference (from prior author revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1
Paramenidies argued that the existence of a thing implied that it could not have "come into being" because "[nothing comes from nothing]??." Moreover he argued that movement was impossible because it requires moving into "the void", and Paramenidies identified "the void" with nothing, and therefore (by definition) it does not exist.
Parmenides argued that the existence of a thing implied that it could not have "come into being" because "[nothing comes from nothing]??." Moreover he argued that movement was impossible because it requires moving into "the void", and Parmenides identified "the void" with nothing, and therefore (by definition) it does not exist.

Parmenides argued that the existence of a thing implied that it could not have "come into being" because "[nothing comes from nothing]??." Moreover he argued that movement was impossible because it requires moving into "the void", and Parmenides identified "the void" with nothing, and therefore (by definition) it does not exist.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited July 23, 2001 4:39 pm by Larry Sanger (diff)
Search: