Difference (from prior minor revision)
(no other diffs)
Changed: 1c1
This article describes secondary sex characteristics in terms of what is unique to a given sex and which provides competitive advantage for sexual selection. But I had been under the impression that public hair in humans was considered a secondary sex characteristic (and adult humans of both sexes have it). Is this not true?
|
This article describes secondary sex characteristics in terms of what is unique to a given sex and which provides competitive advantage for sexual selection. But I had been under the impression that pubic hair in humans was considered a secondary sex characteristic (and adult humans of both sexes have it). Is this not true?
|
This article describes secondary sex characteristics in terms of what is unique to a given sex and which provides competitive advantage for sexual selection. But I had been under the impression that pubic hair in humans was considered a secondary sex characteristic (and adult humans of both sexes have it). Is this not true?