[Home]Soundness

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 3
Difference (from revision 3 to revision 3) (minor diff, author diff)
(The revisions are identical or unavailable.)
An argument is sound if, and only if, (1) the argument is valid and (2) all of its premises are true.

So suppose we have a sound argument:

All men are mortal.
Socrates is a man.
Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

In this case we have an argument where, first, if the premises are all true, then the conclusion must be true (i.e., the argument is valid); and, second, it so happens that the premises are all true. It follows that the conclusion must be true. That is the nice thing about soundness: if you know an argument is sound, then you know that the conclusion of the argument is true. By definition, all sound arguments have true conclusions. So soundness is a very good quality for an argument to have.


In mathemetical logic, the term soundness has a technical meaning; if a theorem holding in some symbolic formal system imples that the theorem holds in some model, then the system is said to be sound. The reverse condition (holding in a model implies holding in a formal system) is called completeness?.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited September 11, 2001 2:24 pm by Iwnbap (diff)
Search: