[Home]Ordered pairs

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 12
Difference (from revision 12 to revision 12) (minor diff, author diff)
(The revisions are identical or unavailable.)
We wish to demonstrate how ordered pairs may be defined in terms of ordinary sets, without introducing new axioms. We begin with a LEMMA: For any objects x, y, z if {x , y} = {x , z} then y = z
Proof: y is a member of {x , y}, so y is a member of {x , z}. Therefore either y = z, and we are done, or else y = x. In this case {x , z} = {x , y} = {x} and so z = x = y.

We now make the
DEFINITION: The ordered pair (x , y) is (x , y) = { {x} , {x , y} }
and prove the fundamental
THEOREM: For every a, b, x, y, (a , b) = (x , y) if and only if x = a and y = b
Proof: It is obvious that if x = a and y = b, then (x , y) = (a , b).
To prove the converse, assume that { {a} , {a , b} } = { {x} , {x , y} }. Then {a} is an element of { {x} , {x , y} } so either {a} = {x} or {a} = {x , y}. In the first case x = a and in the second x = y = a. In either case {a} = {x}, so that { {a} , {a , b} } = { {a} , {a , y} }. By our lemma, this implies that {a , b} = {a , y} and so, by the lemma again, b = y, as required.

/Talk


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited August 6, 2001 8:02 pm by Jan Hidders (diff)
Search: