Responsible government

Responsible government was a term used to refer to one major plank of the program used by the United Kingdom to grant independence to the so-called "white" dominions (notably Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and in contrast to its colonial possessions that did not see significant European settlement).

In the aftermath of the American Revolution, the British government was sensitive to unrest in its remaining colonies with large populations of British colonists. After the abortive [Upper Canada Rebellion]? in 1837 and a matching uprising in Quebec that lasted through the next year, [Lord Durham]? was appointed governor general of Upper Canada (now Ontario) and given the task of examing the issues and determining how to defuse tensions. In his report, one of his recommendations was that colonies which were sufficiently developed should be granted "responsible government", a term which specifically meant the policy of British-appointed governors bowing to the will of elected colonial assemblies. It is worth noting that this is, even to this day, merely a policy in some former British colonies. To take a specific example, the theoretically British-appointed governor-general of Canada has the power to veto any and all legislation passed by the Canadian Parliament. In practice, however, any breach of the policy of responsible government would undoubtedly touch off a constitutional crisis.

In time, the granting of responsible government became the first step on the road to complete independence. In contrast to the American experience, Canada (for example), gradually gained greater and greater autonomy over a considerable period of time (including 1867's [Act of Confederation]?, 1931's Statute of Westminster, and even as late as the repatriation of the British North America Act in 1981).