Logical fallacy/Relativist Fallacy Talk

This article at this writing identifies a "fallacy" I have never seen named as such. Indeed, to call any relativism an instance of a "relativist fallacy" is itself fallacious--a failure to engage in the argument that is needed to demonstrate that whatever sort of relativism one is addressing is false. This entry strikes me, as a philosopher, as simply worthless. I will delete it unless someone can explain to me why I shouldn't. (By the way, I personally am just about the furthest you can get from a relativist.)

OK, a [Google search] actually brings up other results. Please consult [1] for how the present, blatantly biased, Wikipedia article could be improved. --LMS

---

I've edited the entry. I hope ya'll can understand my earlier objection. --LMS