Until the nineteenth century, libraries were shelved haphazardly, or by alphabetical order of author or title, or by size of material (quatro, folio, etc.). Systems of library classification were developed to enable the organization of libraries by subject.
There are many standard systems of library classification in use, and many more have been proposed over the years. These include the Library of Congress classification (LC) and the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), which are the most common systems in the English-speaking world. Other less commonly used classification systems include the Bliss bibliographic classification, the Colon classification and the Universal Decimal Classification. These systems while less commonly used than the LC or DDC are often considered to be theoretically superior, since they make use of the principle of synthesis (combining codes from different lists to represent the different attributes of a work), which is comparitively lacking in LC or DDC.
There are three main types of classification systems:
The most common classification systems, LC and DDC, are essentially enumerative, though with some hierarchial and faceted elements, especially at the broadest and most general level. The first true faceted system was the Colon classification of S. R. Rangathan.
Specialist classification systems have been developed for particular subject areas, and some specialist libraries develop their own classification system that emphasises those areas they specialise in.
Library classification forms part of the field of Library and information science.