I made a thorough overhaul of this article, which I cannot agree was "otherwise superb." It was (still is to some extent) poorly written and contained numerous simple errors. Any professional philosopher who judged Wikipedia by this example would think the project has very little merit. The article is still totally inadequate as an introduction to Kant, but I think I removed most of the mistakes I could find. All I can say is this: please write about what you
know. Don't get me wrong here. I have no objections
at all to students and other nonprofessionals writing articles about philosophy (or other subjects). What I have an objection to is the writing of articles, by
anyone, that are just shot through and through with
mistakes. I find that very frustrating. We can and should expect better! --
LMS