History of SubSet

	Revision 2 . . February 13, 2001 7:27 am by RoseParks [*Definition]
	Revision 1 . . February 13, 2001 7:17 am by RoseParks

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1

Definition:Given a SeT S, a SeT T is a SubSet of S if, for all x belonging to T, x belongs to S.

Definition: Given a SeT S, a SeT T is a SubSet of S if, for all x belonging to T, x belongs to S.

Changed: 3c3

T is a SubSet of S <-> T is contained in S

T is a SubSet of S <-> T is contained in S

Changed: 6c6

Example: Given the SeT of Complex Numbers: C = {a+bi: a, b belong to R, the real numbers}, then R = {x: x is a real number} is a SubSet of C.

Example: Given the SeT of Complex Numbers: C = {a+bi: a, b belong to R, the real numbers}, then R = {x: x is a real number} is a SubSet of C.

Changed: 8c8

This is true because any x in R can be represented as x+0i.

This is true because any x in R can be represented as x+0i.