[Home]History of PersonalProbability

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Revision 5 . . February 15, 2001 5:14 am by (logged).bomis.com
Revision 4 . . February 15, 2001 5:07 am by (logged).bomis.com
Revision 3 . . February 15, 2001 4:59 am by (logged).bomis.com
Revision 2 . . February 14, 2001 7:29 pm by (logged).bomis.com
Revision 1 . . February 14, 2001 7:07 pm by (logged).bomis.com
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 4c4
Recognizing that different people view the same proposition with different degrees of belief, the concept of 'personal probability was championed by [L. J. Savage] and [Bruno deFinetti] and others. They created the idea of defining rational belief as an abstraction of betting behavior subject to the constraint that one doesn't want to be inconsistent in his behavior. This approach has been called Bayesian, subjective or personal probability. A series of critiques of statistical methods was based on this concept and formed the basis of the debate during the decades of 1950 and 1960. Today, there are a variety of applications of personal probability that have gained wide acceptance.
Recognizing that different people view the same proposition with different degrees of belief, the concept of 'personal probability was championed by [L. J. Savage] and [Bruno deFinetti] and others such as [Frank P. Ramsey]. They created the idea of defining rational belief as an abstraction of betting behavior subject to the constraint that one doesn't want to be inconsistent in his behavior. This approach has been called Bayesian, subjective or personal probability. A series of critiques of statistical methods was based on this concept and formed the basis of the debate during the decades of 1950 and 1960. Today, there are a variety of applications of personal probability that have gained wide acceptance.

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: