[Home]History of Wikipedia commentary/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . (edit) September 25, 2001 7:21 am by AstroNomer
Revision 3 . . September 25, 2001 7:18 am by AstroNomer
Revision 2 . . September 25, 2001 7:11 am by AxelBoldt
Revision 1 . . September 25, 2001 7:08 am by AstroNomer
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff)

Changed: 1,4c1
The EB article about "real numbers" claims that every set of real numbers with an upper bound has a least upper bound; this is false.
:Is this false? can you give an example?. I'm under the impression that it is true. In fact, I just took it out of the page because the real number page says exactly the opposite.

Please contemplate the empty set and then put the comment back in. --AxelBoldt


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: