|
Note by LA2 on May 16, 2001: A few days ago, the HomePage was updated to tell us that WikiPedia now has more than 6,000 pages. Maybe another thousand has been added since. At the same time, it feels slower than ever. Right now, searching is so slow it is useless. Submitting a new edit takes tens of seconds. Is there a scalability problem? With the number of pages? With the number of users? How many users are there, anyway? Can we see some statistics? Popularity could kill a service like this if there is no money to upgrade the server hardware. |
|
Note by LA2 on May 16, 2001: A few days ago, the HomePage was updated to tell us that WikiPedia now has more than 6,000 pages. Maybe another thousand has been added since. At the same time, it feels slower than ever. Right now, searching is so slow it is useless. Submitting a new edit takes tens of seconds. Is there a scalability problem? With the number of pages? With the number of users? How many users are there, anyway? Can we see some statistics? Popularity could kill a service like this if there is no money to upgrade the server hardware. |
|
:I'd be interested in knowing how many other people are experiencing slowness. For me, Wikipedia is running faster than I expected. A preview (which does much of the work of an edit) takes less than a second, and searches take about 5 seconds. (Searching is surprisingly fast considering that it opens, unpacks, and searches every single page. Eventually this will change.) |
|
:I'd be interested in knowing how many other people are experiencing slowness. For me, Wikipedia is running faster than I expected. A preview (which does much of the work of an edit) takes less than a second, and searches take about 5 seconds. (Searching is surprisingly fast considering that it opens, unpacks, and searches every single page. Eventually this will change.) |
|
:The Wikipedia code was designed to handle at least 20,000 to 30,000 pages, and I suspect it could handle 50,000 pages as long as they were reasonably distributed by their first letter. Scalability beyond that is a high priority for me. --CliffordAdams |
|
:The Wikipedia code was designed to handle at least 20,000 to 30,000 pages, and I suspect it could handle 50,000 pages as long as they were reasonably distributed by their first letter. Scalability beyond that is a high priority for me. --CliffordAdams |
|
Right now, 4pm GMT, it is a lot faster than just two hours ago. Did anybody change anything? --LA2 |
|
Right now, 4pm GMT, it is a lot faster than just two hours ago. Did anybody change anything? --LA2 |
|
I've noticed no difference in how long it takes to display an edit from when I first started as an IP address and now. The CIA articles do take about 2 seconds apiece to display, but I'm on dialup so I'm really not sure if that's fast or slow. --KoyaanisQatsi |
|
:The slowness on the "RecentChanges" pages is due to the large number of recent modifications. For it to be faster, modify your Preferences so that RecentChanges shows less days, not the default 7. -- AstroNomer |
|
:The slowness on the "Recent Changes" pages is due to the large number of recent modifications. For it to be faster, modify your Preferences so that Recent Changes shows less days, not the default 7. -- AstroNomer |
|
::Quite understandable but on the old server it was quicker. -- Kpjas |
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)