[Home]History of Westminster system

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . December 12, 2001 5:31 am by Chenyu
Revision 6 . . December 12, 2001 5:22 am by Chenyu
Revision 5 . . (edit) December 11, 2001 7:03 am by Derek Ross [copyedit]
Revision 4 . . December 11, 2001 6:32 am by SimonP [The westminster system is a procedural one not an electoral one]
Revision 3 . . December 11, 2001 6:23 am by (logged).167.92.xxx [a description]
Revision 2 . . December 11, 2001 4:50 am by CYD [* Wikification]
Revision 1 . . October 23, 2001 11:42 am by (logged).111.13.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 2c2
government.
government who may possess [reserve powers]? which are not normally exercised.

Changed: 4,6c4,21
In a Westminster system, the head of government is elected from the legislature and must
be able to control a majority of seats within the elected legislative chamber. One consequence of this is that Westminister systems tend to have extremely well-disciplined
legislative parties in which it is highly unusual for a legislator to vote against their party.
In a Westminster system, the members of parliament are elected by popular vote. A
government is then formed by a party or coalition of parties that can command the
support of the majority of parliament. The leader of this group is then named head
of government by the ceremonial head of state.

The head of government must be able to control a majority of seats within the elected legislative chamber. If the parliament passes a resolution of no confidence or if the
government fails to pass a major bill such as the budget, then the government must
resign and new elections are called. The head of government can ask the head of state
to dissolve the legislature and call for new elections and must do so periodically.
Although the dissolution of the legislature and the call for new elections is formally
done by the head of state, by convention the head of state acts according to the
wishes of the head of government and does not possess any independent authority.

There are a number of consequences of the Westminister system. They tend to have extremely well-disciplined legislative parties in which it is highly unusual for a
legislator to vote against their party and in which no confidence votes are very rare.
Also, Westminister systems tend to have strong cabinets in which cabinet members
other than the prime minister are politicians with independent basis of support.
Conversely, legislative committees in Westminister systems tend to be weak.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: